Pakistan: With Supreme Court Ruling on Elections, Political Crisis … – Foreign Policy

From rubies in Mozambique to sand in the South China Sea.
Keri Russell gets Drexel furniture, but no Senate confirmation hearing.
Two books peel back the curtain on the central bank—but miss why it misread the economy in the wake of the pandemic.
FP contributors’ top titles to make sense of the country ahead of its most important election
South Asia Brief: With Supreme Court Ruling, Pakistan’s Political Crisis Flares Again
Create an FP account to save articles to read later and in the FP mobile app.

By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.

NEW FOR SUBSCRIBERS: Click + to receive email alerts for new stories written by Michael Kugelman
Welcome to Foreign Policy’s South Asia Brief.
Welcome to Foreign Policy’s South Asia Brief.
The highlights this week: Pakistan’s Supreme Court rejects an Election Commission decision to delay two provincial elections, China provokes India with a symbolic move along their disputed border, and the World Bank and Asian Development Bank lower India’s economic growth forecast for the year—but it remains a regional bright spot.
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
Pakistan’s Provincial Elections Crisis
This week, Pakistan’s Supreme Court rejected a decision by the country’s Election Commission to delay elections in two provinces, describing it as unconstitutional. It rescheduled elections in Punjab for May 14; Pakistan’s Constitution stipulates that elections must happen within 90 days after an assembly is dissolved, and Punjab’s legislature was dissolved in January.
However, the government in Islamabad, led by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, has already signaled it may not respect the Supreme Court ruling. As a result, a decision meant to reinforce the rule of law could instead trigger a new phase in the country’s ongoing political crisis.
The fight over Punjab’s provincial elections is tied to Pakistan’s upcoming national elections, currently scheduled to be held no later than mid-October. Since his ouster nearly a year ago, former Prime Minister Imran Khan has demanded snap elections. The Punjab assembly was controlled by Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, and he ordered the legislature dissolved early to put more pressure on Islamabad. National and provincial elections typically happen at the same time in Pakistan.
Khan’s gamble backfired: The government said no to early national polls and attempted to push back the provincial elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. (The Supreme Court ruling didn’t set a new date for the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa elections but called for a new petition, which PTI leaders plan to file.) In delaying the elections, the Election Commission cited economic stress and the rising threat of terrorism. Pakistan has previously held national elections amid a terrorism surge, most recently in 2018.
The government’s reaction to the Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday was swift. One senior ruling-party leader decried it as a conspiracy hatched by pro-Khan justices. The governing coalition argues the decision is illegitimate because the verdict was reached by only three judges after six others recused themselves. The day before the ruling, Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari suggested his party wouldn’t accept a decision by a smaller bench, even warning that martial law could be declared if a larger group of judges didn’t issue the ruling.
On Thursday, Pakistan’s National Assembly passed a resolution that rejects the Supreme Court ruling on the provincial elections, urging the prime minister not to accept it.
It’s clear why Islamabad isn’t in a rush to hold elections: Khan’s popularity, which has only grown since his ouster. PTI has performed well in both local elections and public opinion surveys, suggesting it could perform well in national elections. However, Khan’s ability to run is far from assured. Authorities have threatened him with arrest in recent months, and last October the Election Commission disqualified him from running for office for five years based on charges he says are politically motivated. Khan is fighting that decision in the courts.
If the Supreme Court had upheld the Election Commission’s decision to delay provincial elections, the government may have used it as legal pretext to justify delaying national elections as well. That still can’t be ruled out; Islamabad’s rejection of Tuesday’s ruling suggests it won’t necessarily let high court decisions get in the way of its political goals. But for now, the government has a strong interest in remaining vague about the national elections; the uncertainty keeps Khan, his party, and his supporters on edge.
The state is likely to focus on building a stronger case for disqualifying Khan from public office—to hedge against him contesting elections. Khan’s legal team continues to contest his earlier disqualification. In recent weeks, the government has accused Khan of instigating a smear campaign against Pakistan’s army chief and alleged that his party is a group of “miscreants” with links to militancy.
But until the government formally commits to holding national elections as scheduled, Khan and his growing support base will be implacable. Although both Khan and government officials have signaled a willingness to negotiate, political polarization and mistrust run deep in Pakistan. (Khan was targeted in an assassination attempt last November, and he blamed government and security officials—without evidence.)
So the confrontation between Khan and the government rumbles on—a dangerous distraction that sucks up policy space in Pakistan, relegating a severe economic crisis and resurgent terrorist threats to secondary priorities.
What We’re Following
China provokes India over disputed border. In a symbolic provocation, on Sunday the Chinese Civil Affairs Ministry released 11 Chinese names of places—including towns, rivers, and mountain peaks—in the Indian state Arunachal Pradesh near the two countries’ disputed border. Arunachal Pradesh was the site of heavy fighting during the 1962 India-China war, and it remains a tension point. Chinese and Indian troops clashed at the border there as recently as last December.
China’s announcement marks the third time it’s “standardized” names in areas around Arunachal Pradesh since 2017. It clearly represents a non-military tactic to assert its claim to the region. It may also be timed to showcase defiance after a recent report that U.S. intelligence assistance helped Indian soldiers push back the Chinese military incursion late last year. An Indian Foreign Ministry spokesperson rejected the Chinese names and described Arunachal Pradesh as an “integral and inalienable part of India.”
In Foreign Policy this week, Happymon Jacob explains why India’s aversion to speaking openly about China’s aggression on the border is not only a military question.
India’s growth forecast lowered. Since bouncing back from the COVID-19 pandemic, India’s economy has been on a roll, surpassing the United Kingdom’s to become the world’s fifth-largest economy last year. It is one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, but this week, the World Bank and Asian Development Bank lowered earlier growth projections for India for the new fiscal year, which began on April 1.
The World Bank cut its GDP forecast to 6.3 percent from 6.6 percent, and the Asian Development Bank slashed its estimate from 7.2 percent to 6.4 percent. To be sure, these adjusted estimates still mean India will see some of the biggest economic growth in South Asia. The two banks cited slower income growth, rising borrowing costs, a global economic slowdown, and higher oil prices as factors in their less optimistic assessments.
Unemployment remains another persistent concern for India. In March, the country’s unemployment rate was 7.8 percent; Haryana and Rajasthan—breadbasket states—registered unemployment rates of 26.8 and 26.4 percent, respectively. Joblessness has sparked violent protests in some parts of India, including last year in Bihar, where unemployment stood at nearly 18 percent last month.
Massive fire strikes Bangladesh. On Tuesday, a huge fire swept through a crowded shopping area in Dhaka, Bangladesh, destroying 5,000 stores. One shopkeeper said he had “never seen such a fire” in his life—a dramatic observation in the country, which has seen hundreds of deaths in fires in recent years due to lax safety standards. An explosion in the capital killed 17 people just last month.
These accidents and the risk they pose to garment industry workers in particular prompted the U.S. government to suspend trade privileges for Bangladesh in 2013. U.S. officials privately say they’ve had encouraging discussions on labor issues with Bangladeshi counterparts. But the latest fire is another reminder of the continued perils facing workers in Bangladesh.
Under the Radar
On Monday, officials in the Indian state of Gujarat confirmed that a family of four who drowned in the St. Lawrence River trying to cross into the United States from Canada was from a village in Mehsana, Gujarat. The officials said the family left for Canada two months ago. The tragedy marks at least the third time in 15 months that Indians—all from Gujarat—have died while attempting to enter the United States.
In January 2022, another family of four froze to death in Canada while trying to enter the United States. Last December, an Indian man fell to death trying to scale a border wall in Tijuana, Mexico. And in March 2022, six Indian men were arrested in the United States after their boat. In a few cases, people were arrested in India for facilitating illegal immigration.
These tragic incidents serve as a reminder of the complexities of Indian immigration to the United States. The Indian diaspora is one of the largest and most affluent in the country. Many Indians come to the United States to study or work, but recent years have seen increases in undocumented immigrants from India. The Migration Policy Institute cites several possible factors in this shift, including a lack of economic opportunities and long delays in the legal immigration process.
FP’s Most Read This Week
China Has Been Waging a Decades-Long, All-Out Spy War by Calder Walton
DoD’s Making a List—and Checking It Twice by Jack Detsch and Robbie Gramer
Get Out of Russia by Natalia Antonova
Regional Voices
In New Age, development specialist Ferdaus Ara Begum warns that Bangladesh must be prepared to address the impacts on its pharmaceutical sector when the country graduates from the U.N. least-developed countries category. “It is anticipated that prices of medicines will be extensively increased and marginalized people …will be sufferers,” she writes.
An editorial in Kuensel decries Bhutan’s struggles with corporate governance: “Despite numerous reports of poor performance in Bhutan’s corporate sector, the accountability of board members and chief executive directors remains minimal,” it argues.
Scholar Niaz Murtaza, writing in Dawn, describes the institutional dimensions of Pakistan’s political crisis: “Today, the nation is staring into the bottomless pit of a huge abyss as state institutions have become arenas for elite feuds,” he writes.
Michael Kugelman is the writer of Foreign Policy’s weekly South Asia Brief. He is the director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center in Washington. Twitter: @michaelkugelman
Commenting on this and other recent articles is just one benefit of a Foreign Policy subscription.
Already a subscriber? .

View Comments
Join the conversation on this and other recent Foreign Policy articles when you subscribe now.

Not your account?
View Comments
Please follow our comment guidelines, stay on topic, and be civil, courteous, and respectful of others’ beliefs.

The default username below has been generated using the first name and last initial on your FP subscriber account. Usernames may be updated at any time and must not contain inappropriate or offensive language.

NEW FOR SUBSCRIBERS: Want to read more on this topic or region? Click + to receive email alerts when new stories are published on Politics
You’re on the list! More ways to stay updated on global news:
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
The Ukrainian government is now trapped by its own uncompromising—and increasingly indefensible—policy.
Even some non-aligned countries have cautiously signaled support.
Emmanuel Macron served Xi Jinping a strategic triumph on a silver platter.
It seems that only an act of God could dislodge President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Maybe the Feb. 6 earthquake was just that.
Sign up for World Brief
By submitting your email, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to receive email correspondence from us. You may opt out at any time.
Your guide to the most important world stories of the day.
Essential analysis of the stories shaping geopolitics on the continent. Delivered Wednesday.
One-stop digest of politics, economics, and culture. Delivered Friday.
The latest news, analysis, and data from the country each week. Delivered Wednesday.
Weekly update on developments in India and its neighbors. Delivered Thursday.
Weekly update on what’s driving U.S. national security policy. Delivered Thursday.
A curated selection of our very best long reads. Delivered Wednesday & Sunday.
Evening roundup with our editors’ favorite stories of the day. Delivered Monday-Saturday.
A monthly digest of the top articles read by FP subscribers.
By signing up, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to occasionally receive special offers from Foreign Policy.
Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

Turkey’s leader for the last two decades, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, could be defeated in the country’s next presidential election, scheduled for May 14. Criticism has mounted over Show more
By signing up, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use and to occasionally receive special offers from Foreign Policy.
Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

Only FP subscribers can submit questions for FP Live interviews.

Policymakers in Washington don’t agree about much, but there’s a striking bipartisan consensus on one issue: China. On both sides of the aisle, there is agreement that it’s past time tShow more
It’s a strange year for climate policy in the United States. On the one hand, supporters of U.S. President Joe Biden point out that his White House has overseen a dramatic U-turn from the Show more
De-dollarization’s moment might finally be here.
Newly declassified documents contain important lessons for U.S. China policy.
South Asia is particularly vulnerable to extreme weather and its deadly knock-on effects.
The region will host a G-20 meeting next month, but repression persists since New Delhi revoked its semi-autonomy in 2019.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top